Wednesday, July 25, 2007
The 9/11 Report
Friday, July 20, 2007
Confussing Mid-Term
So, this here is my disclaimer. I wasn't exactly sure what was acceptable. However I did this assignment to the best of my ability. A lot of these questions did not pertain to the three GNs I have reviewed already on this blog. I looked up a lot of the GN's we went over in class to write this. So here we go.....
!!!WARNING!!!WARNING!!!WARNING!!!
In this short I will be examining the diverse techniques of symbolic representation, colors, and the different uses of the “gutter” employed by Art Spegialman in his graphic novels “Maus I”, “Maus II” a memoir about mainly his father, and “In the Shadow of No Towers” a mix of first person narrative/memoir and obeisant narration. In “Maus I” and “Maus II” the tone was depressing, so the enlisting of black and white helped to focus the mood. The color scheme created and atmosphere in the graphic novel which drew you in to the dyer quest to survive during the holocaust. Spegialman chose a different approach in the graphic novel “In the Shadow of No Towers”; his use of bright collaborative colors created the mood and set the tone for a very hectic experience. As the towers are falling the pages are bright and busy, making your mind feel anxious, as to draw you into the feelings of the panels. In Maus I and Maus II very symbolic characters were used, they were actually mice. While as “In the Shadow of No Towers” Spegialman used symbolic representation for the characters who were childish and frighten. “Maus” used the symbolism to draw people in, while “In the Shadow of No Towers” use of symbolism was to relay a very child like character. The “gutter” was also used quite differently in the separate graphic novels. An example is that throughout “Maus I” and “Maus II” the gutters were drawn the same just panel by panel. While “In the Shadow of No Towers” there was pages without gutters some with obscure random gutters and some with vary large gutters. The use of a variety of gutters added to the tone of the graphic novel, creating an extremely anxious atmosphere. Both GN seemed to uses the same sort of texts, a little bit of narrative mixed with thought bubbles and dialog.
In the graphic novel “Tintin in the Congo”, written in June 1930 an explore travels to the Congo with his dog and goes through some mishaps of having his car stolen, and several attempts on his life by the village “medicine man”. Lately, there has been controversy that the monkey like representation of the natives and poor broken English creates a racist portrait. There are instances where Tintin is speaking perfect English to the villagers and they are speaking like cavemen. The Commission for Racial Equality complained stating that the book was highly racist and offensive and needed to be pulled from shelves. I disagree with the Commission, and agree at least partially with the author. Herge’ claims that the book was just portraying the naive thinking of the times. I agree with this, back in the 1930’s racism was highly acceptable not only the United States but countries such as
With this example, lets take a look at in the "Shadow of No Towers", by Art Spegialmen. As of right now in time, there is hardly a controversy about feeling the government has placed more emphasis on flipping 9/11 into a revenge war on Iraq, then coming together in peace. So I ask, if the terrorist do win, and our government is toppled and we become suppressed by the Taliban like in Iraq, is this book (let say we can still have an objective opinion of literature) going to be considered supporting the infidels? Will it become unacceptable to read this book, just because times have changed? I think when we start placing a bigger emphasis on "control" and less on creativity and literary value, we lose ourselves. We create a public that goes by the norms instead of stepping up and daring to be great. If we get rid of things we disagree with, we are telling people to stop being themselves, and stop thinking on their own. Is this really what we want for our society? A nation ran by a group who decides what is controversial and what is mainstream?
Art Spegialman’s Maus I and Maus II represented the historical holocaust in a very different way. While other artists were focusing on the horrors of the holocaust through close representation or focused on a totally different genre altogether, Spegialman opted for a way to draw a larger audience in while still staying as close as possible to the history. Though the Jews were mice and the Nazi were cats, Maus portrayed history just as well if not better than other holocaust books of the time. The mice represented the fear the Jewish people had of the Nazis. What is more terrifying to a mouse than a cat? The animals break the fear down for the reader, and makes it more palatable. The story still tells of the trials and heart break a typical Jewish family would have faced during the time. The symbolic animals makes it easier for the reader to face the horrors of the holocaust; while still feeling and even sometimes hurting for the poor family. I feel that without the mice and cats this graphic novel would have been sickening and uncomfortable to read. One example that would have been unbearable if it wasn’t animals is a panel where it shows one of the Nazis grabbing children (mice in this graphic novel) by their feet and slamming their heads in against the wall. If this had been actual life like human characters I probably would have been sick, or stopped reading the novel. The horrors were still portrayed but were almost censored due to the omission of human characters. GN's add a different feeling to an old mood. As someone great once said "a picture is with a 1000 words", so while some feel GN's are for children and do not represent literature, all I can say is count the pictures. Because these pictures and chapters onto the original book. Graphic novles have no boundaries to show true feelings while, novels are left with....only words.
Wednesday, July 18, 2007
In the Shadow of No Towers
The story itself was of Art Spegialmen's first hand account of the trauma he endured at ground zero, of the terrorist attacks on 9/11. Through out the GN, Spegialmen kept showing the "glowing bones of the towers" before they fell. This I found a bit repetitive, however, it was used to show, that he couldn't get this image out of his mind. His story was of him and his wife, trying to locate their daughter at school the day of the attacks. He tells of how traumatized he was, and how it took the attacks of 9/11 for him to realize he was a "grounded cosmopolitan", which he'd never seen before.
Unlike the previous two GN I have read from Spegialmen, it didn't feel like there was a new spin to an old story. I do realize that this book were published in a different country before being released in the USA, but it still does not give much new insight in to the horrors of 9/11. This sort of family affair/ horrors endured, plagued the media. And myself who hasn't really heard many stories of the feelings of the New Yorkers on 9/11, has heard this one many of times.
I was however drawn into his ramblings of how trivial the safety procedures were we adopted after the attack. I probably would have found this GN more interesting if he focused more on his feelings about the politics and his conspiracys, rather than the drawn out family horror as I mentioned previously.
Monday, July 9, 2007
Maus I and Maus II
Spiegelman used mice to represent the Jews during the Holocaust. The cats are the Nazis and the dogs are the Americans. I think the mice make you feel more sympathetic, and draws you in. He depicts everyday life during the war. Though, everyday life is a lot harder than now. He had to save his rations of food to get clothes or anything else he needed. He also had to know how to do everything, otherwise he'd go to the gast chambers. These GN were moving. Spiegelmen went between the his father's stories of WWII and his last days with his father (present time) in the last Maus. He also told of his hardships in writing the GN, and how it was a struggle to represent the struggles of the Holocaust in a new, yet still moving way.
I felt that though these GN were of a extremely paved road experience, that Spiegelmen, brought a new and interesting light to the holocaust. With his artwork, whiched used cute animals to depict an horrible experience combined with a first person narrative, he brought you to places you could only imagine in a novel. I'd recommend this for anyone interested in history.